Why Isn’t American Football an Olympic Sport?

26
5 minutes, 33 seconds Read
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Why Isn't American Football an Olympic Sport

[TranslatedArticles]

 

The game of American football has been around since 1869, just four years after the American Civil War ended. For some perspective on how long ago that was, the telephone wasn’t invented by Alexander Graham Bell until 1876, a full seven years later. That makes American football really, really old.

For a sport that is played in over 80 countries, is far and away the most popular game in the United States, and has been around longer than even the telephone, it might seem strange that American football has not been adopted as an Olympic sport. Yet that is most certainly the current situation, with the sport’s recent exclusion from the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo.

The decision to exclude it is very near-sighted, as introducing American football as an Olympic sport would not only put it on an international stage and give it the opportunity to grow, it would also attract a massive audience of American football fans to the Summer Olympics who wouldn’t otherwise have watched them. Estimates vary, but well over 120 million people watched Super Bowl 50 between the Denver Broncos and the Carolina Panthers – not an audience that should be overlooked. The International Olympic Committee is missing out on an incredible opportunity to extend its market share and coverage. We can be sure that it will see far more viewers than for sports such as canoeing and synchronized swimming, which are both coincidentally approved sports for Tokyo 2020.

So why isn’t American football an Olympic sport?

Olympic sports such as ice hockey and basketball were invented in 1875 and 1891, respectively, so we know that the age of the sport is not a factor in this decision. Sports like boxing and rugby – generally considered to be more brutal than American football – will both be featured in the next two Olympics as well, so safety clearly isn’t the primary concern. Perhaps the nomenclature attributed to the sport, identifying it as American football, carries some restrictions? Attaching any culture to the name of any sport will naturally induce some preconceived positive or negative stereotypes about said culture by fans. However this could easily be circumvented by identifying American football with a different name such as gridiron, which Anglo cultures such as Great Britain and Australia have already done. Japan is hosting the 2020 Summer Olympics and routinely finishes in the top 4 in international American football competitions, so location clearly isn’t a factor. Maybe the International Olympic Committee views the sport as being disproportionately dominated by the United States and other countries such as Canada, Mexico, and Japan? The same can be said about sports such as baseball, basketball, and softball, but all three will likely be included in the 2020 Tokyo games.

Then what are the real reasons for the exclusion of American football from the Olympics? There is really only one reason that makes any sense here, and it’s a tough one to accept because it’s our own doing:

The only reason that our great sport has not been included in the Olympics is due to the lack of vision and direction by the International Federation of American Football (IFAF).

IFAF, American football’s counterpart to FIFA, is in fact by no means equal to FIFA. The vast majority of American football players, coaches, and fans around the world have no idea who is currently running IFAF or for that matter what the committee’s objectives actually are. It is mainly an amateur, volunteer federation with no full-time paid commissioner. IFAF wields far less influence and power than the National Football League, which has by no means given its full endorsement of IFAF to begin with. The NFL offers virtually zero support for IFAF’s main tournament – the IFAF World Championship – and for good reason. IFAF has given no indication that it even knows who is running the show or what direction it is heading in.

For instance, in December 2014 the local organizing committee for the 2015 IFAF World Championship in Stockholm announced that the funds it had raised for the event had mysteriously disappeared, a shell corporation was identified in the disappearance, and it was announced that the President of IFAF and the Swedish American Football Federation (SAFF) would be going on extended leave for health reasons. The tournament was moved to Canton, Ohio at the last moment and the number of participating teams was cut from 12 to 7, but things took an even more bizarre turn from there. IFAF announced the commissioner’s resignation in April 2015, only to see him gain control of the IFAF website the next day, delete the announcement, and claim that he was the victim of a coup d’état. Coincidentally, this all happened at the same time that American football was up for nomination to be selected as an Olympic sport. It is unclear who ultimately represented this formal bid to the International Olympic Committee, but common sense can only tell you that the situation was very unstable leading up to the decision.

To be fair, there are several IFAF committee members who have contributed positively to the development of the sport and deserve commendation for their efforts, but it has not been enough. The direction has been too diluted, too inconsistent, and too tumultuous to ever be taken seriously by organizations such as the IOC or the NFL. IFAF has yet to develop an observable plan and hasn’t shown that it can gather a consensus of support by its member countries.

This is why The Growth of a Game came into existence in the first place – to fill the gap in development that has been vacated by IFAF and our de facto leaders. In Europe alone, American football is played in 41 different countries by over 1,500 adult teams, and the sport will continue to grow and flourish with or without the guidance of IFAF.

With the chaos of IFAF and the oft-corrupt FIFA, it begs the question: Are we getting fair representation for our contributions?

Unless IFAF somehow gets its act together or something else pops up in its place, inclusion in the Olympic games will remain on the distant horizon.

Still, the overwhelming response to The Growth of a Game has made it easy to be optimistic about the future of American football. This sport is on the cusp of greatness and just needs that little extra push to be identified in the mainstream of most European countries. We’ll get there, and with our continued efforts we’ll soon see the day when American football receives the full recognition it deserves.

Let’s keep moving forward, together.

 

What do you think is preventing American football from becoming an Olympic sport? Do you agree with some of these reasons? Let us know in the comments section below.

author

Travis Brody

Travis is the founder and main contributor of The Growth of a Game. A former quarterback from Southern California and current sports executive, Travis developed a passion for advancing the game of American football in Europe during his three seasons as a player and coach for the Brussels Bulls. He's now the President of Premier Class Consulting, a consulting firm that specializes in strengthening sports teams and organizations of all levels.

Similar Posts

26 Comments

  1. avatar
    Rafael Ruiz says:

    There are lots of reasons of why this was going to fail. And is not that I want it to fail, I would have loved our sport to be Olympic, but I have mentioned before that the process of becoming an Olympic sport is not only about how much money, or people is practising it around the world, they are indeed one of the points but there are other that are more important.

    One of the first I can think of is the homogeneity of the rules, some countries use different years/versions of NCAA rules, other who knows maybe some modification of them, others IFAF rules. There has to be homogeneity in the rules used world wide, little by litle IFAF rules are being adopted in many countries and maybe this is the future if we want to reach a good point in this case in front of the IOC.

    Then comes one of the fundamentals of Olympic sports, doping test and the WADA code. Although as I recall IFAF adopted the WADA code, there is no real control and reporting around the world, how many federation keep track and send back to IFAF results and reports to an official WADA lab? This is a key point. I bet none or very few do controls.

    I agree 100% in what you said, unless IFAF gets their things together, comes with a plan/roadmap to follow and all countries commit to work for IOC recognition it will remain as a dream only. And this process will take few years to even get fully started.

    Now there’s another side to this, if IOC accepts the sport based on money, it sets a precedent where IOC will loose any credibility as an organization.

    Have a great day! 🙂

  2. avatar
    TorgeirPettersen says:

    “Unless IFAF somehow gets its act together or something else pops up in its place, inclusion in the Olympic games will remain on the distant horizon”

    Inclusion in the Olympic games will remain on the distant horizon regardless of the quality of the governing body. It is delusional to think that’s the difference maker.

    Inclusion in the Olympic games would be neat, but to be honest it seems like the wrong focus to have for MANY decades to come. HOWEVER: Being recognized by the IOC -even without being an Olympic sport- is the real key, because it cements the governing status, and gives football vastly better conditions within many national governing bodies for sports. If you want to avoid a situation with rival organizations and the corporation NFL controlling football on a wider scale down the road – that is when and why IOC recognition matters. Nevermind the Olympics themselves.

  3. avatar
    Dylan Coopersmith says:

    There’s not enough time for the Olympics to host football, for like basketball baseball and hockey you can play everyday in the two week span football is every week, if you play football everyday it’s going to cause major injuries

  4. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Great points Rafael, thanks! I think the rules can be standardized, just as they have been in the IFAF World Championship. However, the drug testing is certainly an issue. Hope to see this addressed in the future.

  5. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Thanks for your comment Dylan! This is certainly a key argument. Still, if the timetable was maximized to play on the first and final day of the Olympics, it could be achieved. Obviously the time between games would have to be cut down as well, but the 2015 IFAF World Championship was able to achieve this using an even shorter time frame.

  6. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Thanks for your comment! I agree with you on the 2nd point – IOC recognition does matter. But it pales in comparison to representation in the Olympics itself.

  7. avatar
    Massimiliano Delfino says:

    I agree with your point of view about . I started playing football in Italy in 1979 and I am a coach since 1985. We have had a lot of problems about organization. We changed 4 times our Federation. Now finally it seems the stuff could be changed. It is important and fundamental to increase the school programs starting with flag football. Teaching flag football to kids 9 yo will build players of 15 yo with 6 years of experience that can playing tackle. At same time the parents can learning basic rules having quiteness and happiness. All of us all the people that love this sport must be pazient working to this way….the way of future. In conclusion I think positive about the entrance in Olimpic Games through the flag football. Considering flag football a real sport with an own soul could be opening the way to play tackle. Thanks so much for your attention. God save the American Football. Coach Delfino

  8. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Grazie mille, @massimilianodelfino:disqus. Flag football is definitely an important way to introduce young athletes to the sport and will help build the level of play for years to come.

  9. avatar
    Massimiliano Delfino says:

    Thanks you Travis

    Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android

    Il Mar, 15 Mar, 2016 alle 18:41, Disqus ha scritto: “Grazie mille, @Massimiliano Delfino. Flag football is definitely an important way to introduce young athletes to the sport and will help build the level of play for years to come.” | |
    | |  Settings | |
    |   |

    | |

    | |
    |
    A new comment was posted on The Growth of a Game
    |
    | |
    |
    | |
    Travis Brody

    Grazie mille, Massimiliano Delfino. Flag football is definitely an important way to introduce young athletes to the sport and will help build the level of play for years to come.
    1:41 p.m., Tuesday March 15 | Other comments by Travis Brody

    |   |
    |
    |   | Reply to Travis Brody |   |

    |
    |   |

    |

    | Travis Brody’s comment is in reply to Massimiliano Delfino: |
    |   |
    | |
    I agree with your point of view about . I started playing football in Italy in 1979 and I am a coach since 1985. We have …
    Read more
    |

    |
    | |

    | |

    | |
    |
    You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to massimilianodelfino.
    You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to massimilianodelfino by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings. |
    | |

    | |

  10. avatar
    rodrigo says:

    Superbowl is in January and some of the best playoffs are played in chilling temperatures and under snow….why not apply for Winter Olympics instead of summer? I think it will have more chances this way as it can add more value/audience to the winter ones..

  11. avatar
    Gurahk Weavile says:

    American Football is NOT making it to the Olympics, for the reason that it presents an unfair advantage to the USA that is thus far impossible to suppress. Until there is a reasonable balance between major nations outside North America, this sport will never make it into the Olympiad.

  12. avatar
    Istvan Buda says:

    Unless you get rid of breaks and stoppages it will not make it . Have you seen Olympic sports ? Al the sports have no stoppages every 10 second

  13. avatar
    Mario Altamirano says:

    Mr. Travis Brody. I agree with you 100% in using the name of GRIDIRON that we already have. Doing so will eliminate a lot of resistance and animosity that exist in many countries where the word “FOOTBALL” is used to refer to the most popular sport in the world. In my life time i had the opportunity to visit many nations and i learned how sensitive and proud these people are about the sport they love. I really commend you. You are the first person that have the courage to put the fingers on many of these key issues. My respect to you.

  14. avatar
    Look Out! says:

    America already dominates Basketball. Have you heard of the 1986 Dream Team? They literally killed some teams. Dominating a sport has nothing to do with this.

  15. avatar
    Hugo Pointillart says:

    Hi travis,

    Interestng article, i would like to point out one simple argument that will keep Football out of the olympics, a simple logistical question : The number of athletes (45 per team is already three time the number of any other sport there), the lenght of game, recuperation period, etc. We should take exemple in Rugby, that re-entered the competition using rugby 7 (and not 15 men) to fit the format. My conclusion is that Arena football or flag football would be a better way to enter the olympics.

  16. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts @hugopointillart:disqus. The U.S. brought 41 rowers, 47 swimmers, and 129 track and field athletes to the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio. Those sports also require far more coordination, since there are multiple events and heats within each of those disciplines. American football may have a large roster, but it is still played 11v11, just like football (soccer).

  17. avatar
    Hugo Pointillart says:

    A soccer roster is less than 20 players, so one football team would make 2 teams of soccer (soccer being, although not very welcome to the olympics, is too big a sport worldwide to be ignored) , knowing that football is not established as a women sport, does not hold leagues in africa. Flag football is the only way in the olympics.
    You can blame the IFAF (and you are right they are beyond ridiculous) but football does not fit the olympic format (short event, limited number of athletes, must hold women league, must hold all 5 continent leagues). Flag on the other hand, fits all those imperatives

  18. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Hi Hugo, that goes back to my original point: the U.S. track and field team has a roster of 129 people. If you want to break that down even further, that’s 64 on the men’s team and 65 on the women’s team, far more than a 45-man football roster. I’m not against the inclusion of flag football in the Olympics, but why would we emphasize that over the greater sport of tackle football? There is a previous precedent against every possible objection to its inclusion (players on the field, roster size, health concerns, etc.). Why should American football be required to evolve its basic principles to become an Olympic sport? Soccer didn’t do this. Basketball didn’t do this. Ice hockey didn’t do this. Baseball didn’t do this. Besides, there is virtually zero fan-base for flag football – no one goes to flag football games besides friends and family, whereas you can get 100,000 people at a tackle game.

  19. avatar
    Travis Brody says:

    Hi @gurahkweavile:disqus, you’re right that North American teams have been at the top of the sport. However, so has Japan and several European countries are also on the rise. If American football became an Olympic sport it would erase some of that advantage.

  20. avatar
    Roald Piqueur says:

    Honestly, I dont believe we will ever see 11 on 11 american football on the olympics. I would even say I don’t support the idea. The sport just isn’t built to endure the multitude of games in a short timespan. We would have to adapt the sport a little like 7v7 rugby or have flag football on the olympics. And yes, flag is not tackle football but it is a better introduction to our sport. I also get a lot of people now coming up to me: Hey did you see that rugby game on the olympics? (Assuming I coach rugby) After I remind them of the difference between rugby and AFthey do say they like the explosive nature of 7v7 rugby (less scrums, more action) So this would make the case for a more adapted AF on the olympics.
    However you do have very valid points on IFAF, because in the state they are in right now we will not make any progress be it in recognition, some form of football/gridiron on the olympics, popularity of the sport, etc.

  21. avatar
    Hugo Pointillart says:

    Those 129 people compete for 47 medals when 45 football player would compete for 1.
    Arena football could work, but it would have to be developped worldwide. Rugby is a very good exemple of a federation that negociated for years to see their sport reappear and they fitted the OG format ( you don’t tell the board to work around your schedule, they tell you to work around theirs)
    Now the fan base is not a relevant argument when it comes to OG competition, how many people are fan of archery? Sailing, or synchronized swimming compared to other sport?

  22. avatar
    Patrick Roth says:

    1. IFAF should be in Switzerland, we already know how to handle this kind of organizations, FIFA in Zurich, UEFA in Nyon and the Olympic Committee in Lausanne
    2. Football is not just played in the U.S. there is no reason to call it ‘American Football’, outside of the UK, like in english speaking countries like Ireland, Canada or Australia they call it soccer no? Just call it football, maybe better tackle-football or depending on the version/rules you play.
    I would start and try to implement the smallest version, either flag-football or start with six-man in tackle football. If the popularity growth got to eight-man, nine-man, 11-man and up to 12-man. The play football as well in Canada!

  23. avatar
    Estranged Plenis says:

    Actually they would be competing for 3 medals (bronze, silver, and gold). Also Archery, sailing, and synchronized swimming have been around forever and most were part of the original olympic games. Also, the roster could be cut down to around 30 if the offense and defense worked together on special teams.

  24. avatar
    Hugo Pointillart says:

    Great rethorical point. I can also multiply the numbers of medals by 3 in athletics, for a total of 141 medals with 129 athletes… Still winning that points. I don’t care how long archery has been around, it has no common ground with football. Cut down the roster, you still have 18 more players than a basketball selection…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0

Your Cart